Disclaimer: Austin S Fallah is not a theologian, a biblical scholar, a pastor, or an apostle. He is the child of Hala-Na-Meleka-God-Almighty, born through Mr. Nyumah Taylor Fallah(Son of Cornor Fallah of Foya Kama) and Tuwoh Siah Kardu Fallah (Alpha of the Fallah’s Clan).
Inconsistent preaching of the Good News occurs when messengers fail to emulate the Yeshua they proclaim, often resulting in hypocritical or judgmental messaging that drives people away from, rather than toward, Yeshua. True Hala-Na-Meleka-God-Almighty gospel proclamation requires aligning life with grace, rather than using it as a “stage-play” for superiority.
“Quick side note: how could you share a message about a Savior you don’t care to emulate? Such inconsistency, in and of itself, would make this Savior look undesirable to follow anyway.” — Austin Gentry
“I’m convinced that many people have spiritual doubts, not because of Jesus, but because of His followers. Instead of showing us God as He really is… some Christians make God seem narrow-minded, harsh, judgmental, and untrustworthy.” — Pastor Craig Groeschel.
“Religious hypocrisy doesn’t just make the church look bad. It devastates lives. It covers for abusers, shields the powerful from accountability, and suffocates the very people Jesus came to set free.” — Dan Foster.
“The preacher must never confront his people with Bible truths that he himself has refused to face in his own life.” — Chuck Lawless.
“If a believer isn’t turning from sin, he doesn’t need more tasering from the preacher; he needs more exposure to the grace of God. It’s grace that changes us.” — The Gospel Coalition.
“It is the acknowledgment of what ought to be true of us even when we live in a way that betrays that truth.” — C.S.Lewis.
“The teachings attributed to Jesus in the Gospels present a series of contradictions, making it difficult to discern his actual message… These inconsistencies create confusion for those who attempt to build a moral life based on them.” — Hidden Contradictions.
“Because of Jesus Christ, our failures do not have to define us. They can refine us.” — Dieter F. Uchtdorf.
“If people are going to recognize God’s work in your life, they have to see the work of Christ in you in both the ups and the downs.” — Dr. David Jeremiah.
“Are the sick people in hospitals that need healing, o r are they created in churches just for money?” – Unknown.
By: Austin S Fallah – A True Son of the Planet Earth Soil: fallahas@yahoo.com.
Throughout history, the person of Jesus Christ(Yeshua) has been at the core of Christian faith and belief.
This raises critical questions concerning the interpretation of His life, teachings, and the events surrounding His crucifixion.
Who is the real Jesus(Yeshua)? Is there one Jesus (Yeshua), or are there multiple interpretations that reflect the diverse perspectives of those who preach the good news?
This inquiry invites a closer examination of the apparent inconsistencies in the messages conveyed by various denominations and individuals.
This is based on my personal observations, in-person interactions, listening to the radio, and the preaching on social media and television by many.
By probing the scriptural interpretations and historical contexts surrounding Jesus (Yeshua), we can better understand the complexities of His identity and significance in a contemporary setting.
The contrasting portrayals of Yeshua have sparked debate for centuries; however, this dialogue often lacks a nuanced understanding of who Jesus (Yeshua) truly embodies.
To some of us believers, Yeshua(Jesus) is the revered Savior, the son of Hala-Na-Meleka-God-Almighty, who brings salvation to humanity.
For others, particularly critics of organized religion, Jesus(Yeshua) may appear as a controversial figure constructed by male-dominated narratives within the Bible.
This dichotomy presents two significant Jesuses(Yeshuas): the Jesus(Yeshua)(This’ truly who the real Yeshua is) of faith and the Jesus(Yeshua)of scripture.
By unraveling these complex identities, we can appreciate how inconsistent preaching exacerbates misunderstandings about His life and purpose.
To explore these identities, one must first consider the life of Jesus (Yeshua)as depicted in the New Testament.
The historical Jesus(Yeshua), often viewed through the lens of critical scholarship, emerges as an itinerant preacher from Nazareth, whose teachings centered on love, forgiveness, humility, and compassion.
Additionally, His radical approach to religious and societal norms challenged the status quo and attracted both followers and adversaries.
The assertion that Jesus(Yeshua)was sent by Hala-Na-Meleka-God-Almighty to redeem humanity provides a robust theological basis for accepted Christian doctrine.
However, this narrative frequently collides with historical accounts of the time and the layers of interpretation imposed by various authors of New Testament Biblical books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John (the stories are “according to so and so”).
The first time I heard the passage below was from a preacher from Liberia who preached the message ” Did you know Jesus Killed?” We were all stunned when he said that. He proved his point (question) with the passage below. I know many of you are just seeing and reading it for the first time, ehn, ehn, ehn.
When scrutinizing passages like Luke 19:27—”But those enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slay them before me”, one can grapple with the implications of this statement.
Does this depict Jesus(Yeshua) as a vengeful figure advocating for violence against dissenters, or is it more metaphorical, calling for accountability among those who oppose his teachings?
Your don’t bring any theological philosophy into this. The grammar is correct, plain and clear, making it easy to read and understand.
The Gospel of Luke has often been regarded as promoting inclusivity.
Yet, this verse starkly deviates from the True Yeshua Christ who embodies love and forgiveness.
The challenge, therefore, lies in reconciling these disparate views within the broader narrative of Jesus’s (Yeshua) life and mission.
This inconsistency reveals a significant cultural dilemma within Christian preaching.
Many congregations focus intently on the redemptive messages, overlooking moments that are seemingly difficult to reconcile with the loving persona they wish to promote.
This selective emphasis can lead to a distorted image of Jesus (Yeshua) that fails to encompass the entirety of His teachings.
Research has shown that theologians such as N.T. Wright argues that the Jesus (Yeshua) of the New Testament is intrinsically tied to His Jewish roots and to the socio-political environment of 1st-century Judea.
He insists that understanding this context is vital to recovering the real Jesus(Yeshua), who passionately embodied the prophetic message of Hala-Na-Meleka-God-Almighty’s justice.
But the question arises: are members of faith communities aware of the broader scholarly discourse surrounding the interpretation of Jesus (Yeshua)?
The predominance of anecdotal evidence in preaching suggests a significant gap between scholarly research and congregational understanding.
In many cases, biblical literacy is low(I am one of those in this category), and individuals may rely excessively on their leaders for doctrinal interpretation.
This dependence can lead to a homogenized understanding of Jesus (Yeshua) that fails to account for controversial scriptural nuances or alternative scholarly perspectives.
In the absence of engagement with diverse interpretations, such as liberation theology or feminist Christology, congregants may inadvertently perpetuate a one-dimensional view of Jesus(Yeshua) that does not reflect His complex nature.
Moreover, this reliance on authoritative figures for doctrinal understanding raises questions about accountability among church leaders.
Within the spectrum of Christian denominations, the authenticity of Jesus'(Yeshua) character is shaped by the voices that proclaim His message.
When church leaders emphasize certain traits or attributes of Jesus (Yeshua) while omitting others, they risk fostering an environment susceptible to misunderstanding.
Consequently, the church becomes a space where the complexities of faith are oversimplified, leading to interpretations that exclude critical dialogue about difficult questions.
The implications of this trend extend beyond the church walls, affecting individual believers and society at large.
When conflict arises over interpretations of religious texts, individuals may dismiss or defend viewpoints that resonate with their preconceived beliefs without critically examining the material. (Please don’t come after me; I am not a theologian nor a biblical scholar, but I am only sharing my observations over the years.)
This creates an environment in which topics such as gender equality, social justice, and interfaith dialogue become contentious and polarizing, exacerbating divisions within the church and broader community.
The portrayal of Jesus (Yeshua) as the Savior of all humankind is an essential element of Christian teachings but yet the messages conveyed to newcomers or seekers of the faith often depend on who delivers them.
Can one truly embrace the idea that Jesus (Yeshua) is a comprehensive Savior when narratives from various contexts are rife with inconsistencies?
Perhaps one significant challenge that contemporary Christians face is the need to reexamine the essential messages of the true Jesus (Yeshua) and the Jesus of the Bible, while reconciling the fact that many aspects of His life and teachings are open to interpretation.
It is through recognizing the potential for diverse understandings of Jesus (Yeshua) that a richer and more inclusive conversation can emerge.
Embedding the historical context and scholarly interpretation of Jesus (Yeshua) can empower believers to challenge the status quo of Christian preaching.
Interpreting scripture through a critical lens enables dialogue with differing perspectives, allowing for a deeper connection to the multifaceted nature of Jesus’ (Yeshua) identity.
Recognizing the tension between the true Jesus (Yeshua) of faith and the Jesus (Yeshua) f history invites believers to own their understanding of the gospel,particularly the King James Bible and the Queen James Bible, a step toward addressing the inconsistencies that may exist in preaching.
Furthermore, engaging in discussions surrounding the complexities of faith in bible studies, round tables, at homes, and other gatherings encourages believers to venture beyond the surface of biblical narratives.
Empowered with the tools of critical thinking and biblical literacy, individuals are equipped to discern between dogma and interpretation.
By fostering an environment that embraces dialogue, believers foster an inclusive space where complex ideas can be explored without fear, and unity can be achieved without sacrificing diversity.
The inconsistency of preaching the good news of Jesus Christ(Yeshua) lies at the intersection of historical interpretation, cultural norms, and sociopolitical context.
Understanding the real-true Jesus(Yeshua)beyond scriptural interpretations, demands an honest contemplation of how individuals encounter faith through diverse and sometimes conflicting lenses.
Through engaging scholarly work, reexamining teachings, and promoting inclusivity, Christians can reclaim the narrative of Jesus(Yeshua), as a multidimensional figure.
Only by doing so can they embody the true essence of the good news and inspire a community grounded in love, compassion, and understanding.
The world needs the authentic message of Jesus(Yeshua)now more than ever, as believers commence the formidable task of preaching the truth amidst a patchwork of interpretations.
